4th Feb.
[if supportFields]><span style='mso-element: field-begin'></span><span style='mso-spacerun:yes'> </span>ADDIN EN.REFLIST <span style='mso-element:field-separator'></span><![endif]Levis, C., etc. (2017). Persistent effects of pre-Columbian plant domestication on Amazonian forest composition. Science, 355, 925-931
This is a paper from science, which has amazingly many co-authors.
Always, I think paper from Science is not easy to understand. Very strange. Science should be a paper whose audience is public. But for student like me, who is doing research her/himself, it's so hard to understand. How could people without research background understand.
Anyway, I think the research result is interesting, but the most interesting is the chicken or egg question: Did humans enrich forests in southwestern and eastern Amazonia with domesticated species, or did humans choose to live close to forests naturally rich in these species?
I will read this paper once (or twice) again and try to understand and learn from it!
[if supportFields]><span style='font-size:11.0pt;line-height:107%; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-fareast-font-family: DengXian;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:ZH-CN;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA'><span style='mso-element:field-end'></span></span><![endif]
